|
Scott's Blog - 3/30/07 Today's Sign of the Apocalypse
Time Magazine has published an article in favor..that's right..in favor of teaching the Bible in the public schools. I'm pretty sure that event was not mentioned in Matthew 24 as a sign of the Last Days, but it certainly is something I never thought I would see. The argument put forth by writer David van Biema is that whether one believes the message or not, it is virtually impossible to understand United States history, classical and modern literature, and even the debates that rage in our culture without a basic understanding of the Bible. SIMPLY PUT, THE BIBLE IS THE MOST influential book ever written. Not only is the Bible the best-selling book of all time, it is the best-selling book of the year every year. In a 1992 survey of English teachers to determine the top-10 required "book-length works" in high school English classes, plays by Shakespeare occupied three spots and the Bible none. And yet, let's compare the two: Beauty of language: Shakespeare, by a nose. Depth of subject matter: toss-up. Breadth of subject matter: the Bible. Numbers published, translated etc: Bible. Number of people martyred for: Bible. Number of wars attributed to: Bible. Solace and hope provided to billions: you guessed it. And Shakespeare would almost surely have agreed. According to one estimate, he alludes to Scripture some 1,300 times. As for the rest of literature, when your seventh-grader reads The Old Man and the Sea, a teacher could tick off the references to Christ's Passion--the bleeding of the old man's palms, his stumbles while carrying his mast over his shoulder, his hat cutting his head--but wouldn't the thrill of recognition have been more satisfying on their/own? If literature doesn't interest you, you also need the Bible to make sense of the ideas and rhetoric that have helped drive U.S. history. "The shining city on the hill"? That's Puritan leader John Winthrop quoting Matthew to describe his settlement's convenantal standing with God. In his Second Inaugural Address, Abraham Lincoln noted sadly that both sides in the Civil War "read the same Bible" to bolster their opposing claims. When Martin Luther King Jr. talked of "Justice rolling down like waters" in his "I Have a Dream" speech, he was consciously enlisting the Old Testament prophet Amos, who first spoke those words. The Bible provided the argot--and theological underpinnings--of women's suffrage and prison-reform movements. And then there is today's political rhetoric. For a while, secular liberals complained that when George W. Bush went all biblical, he was speaking in code. Recently, the Democratic Party seems to have come around to the realization that a lot of grass-roots Democrats welcome such use. Without the Bible and a few imposing secular sources, we face a numbing horizontality in our culture--blogs, political announcements, ads. The Case for Teaching The Bible TIME The responses are somewhat predictable. The secularists are dithering about the perceived sense of preference the Bible would receive if taught in schools. Secular challengers opposed to the textbook feel that it is still “written as if I am a Protestant Christian teaching Protestant Christians," according to Jennifer Kendrick, one of the first Bible-literacy teachers in the nation, in the Time article. Outside sources have to be brought in to balance the content. Also, secular opponents argue that even if the book is impartial, the person that teaches it may not be.Christians Pleasantly Surprised by Time's Pro-Bible Article Christianpost.com But a number of Christian leaders have already signed on as being wholeheartedly in favor. Prison Fellowship founder Chuck Colson gives this positive review to the proposal. This is good news, and no one can claim to be truly educated without knowing the contents of the Bible. Students will become familiar with the Bible’s great themes and stories. They will read, with greater understanding, works by Herman Melville, John Locke, and Martin Luther King, whose writings are filled with biblical allusions. And having once dipped into the Bible, I believe, they will be more inspired to read on their own. They may even consider joining a Bible study to learn more—that is, if somebody invites them. And they just might remember the Bible’s stories and teachings when making decisions about whether to engage in casual sex or follow the crowd into crime. Teaching the Bible in Public Schools Christianpost.com What to make of this biblically? There is room for concern. Much like having a unit in a biology class devoted to a biblical view of creation taught by a die hard evolutionist, a teacher devoted to disparaging the message of the Word could use the class as a one sided opportunity for mockery. Much like Jesus' assessment of the Sadducees, “You are mistaken, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God." (Matthew 22:29), a secularly minded individual would be hard pressed to provide an objective overview of the Bible. But in my experience in public education, the Bible is already bashed on a regular basis in classes that have nothing to do with its content. If the Bible is allowed to speak, at least these antagonists will have to deal with the facts on the ground, not some reinvented straw man of their fantasies. And whether one tries to treat the Word as just another piece of literature or not, the Bible will always make an impact on human hearts. “ For as the rain comes down, and the snow from heaven, Who knows? Maybe random acts of righteousness will start breaking out in our public schools?
Scott's Blog 3/29/07 UFOs - A Last Days Deception Is this your Daddy?
As never before we are a culture that is "looking up". Unfortunately, we are not looking for God, but for our place in the universe. Even a casual channel surf across the cable reveals movies, series, documentaries, cartoons and even commercials that seem to be driving home a common theme. We are part of a galactic community. It will only be a matter of time and technological development before a representative from a federation of planets will make "First Contact". When this happens, mankind will be unified as never before. War, poverty, disease will be a thing of the past. Humanity will take an evolutionary leap forward and a golden age will begin. Or so we are told. Can you imagine how the average person would react if such an intergalactic emissary came on the scene? What if this person could provide a "seeing is believing" level of proof that their claims were true? What if they could give life to inanimate objects? What if they could summon fire from the sky? What if this representative from a federation of planets even appeared to rise from the dead? The Bible prophetically tells us what this reaction will be. “Who is like the beast? Who is able to make war with him?" (Revelation 13:4) "Whoa, Scott! Are you saying the Anti-Christ is going to be a space alien?" No. The Anti-Christ is going to be a liar and a deceiver of the first order. The Bible tells us he will say and do anything necessary to get the world not only to follow him, but even to worship him. The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness. (II Thessalonians 2:9-12) As we have seen, the UFO phenomena is a spiritual one. It is geared to send out an unsubtle and unbiblical message. We are not special. Evolution is true. Humanity needs to unify in order to take our true place in the universe. But there is another common theme in the doctrine taught by the modern UFO experience - ET is really our creator. The theory is called "Directed Panspermia" and suggests the amazing complexity of life is no accident. But instead of acknowledging the God of the Bible as our Creator, extra terrestrials get the credit. Nobel prize winner Professor Francis Crick, OM FRS, who along with Leslie Orgel proposed the theory of directed panspermia in 1973. This suggests that the seeds of life may have been purposely spread by an advanced extraterrestrial civilization. Crick argues that small grains containing DNA, or the building blocks of life, fired randomly in all directions is the best, most cost effective strategy for seeding life on a compatible planet at some time in the future. The strategy might have been pursued by a civilization facing catastrophic annihilation, or hoping to terraform planets for later colonization.Panspermia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In movies like 2001: A Space Odyssey aliens are given the credit for guiding the evolution of man "from ape to angel". In the recently released Tim Robbins film, Mission to Mars, we are introduced to our creators - an alien civilization. In this light it is significant that the Anti-Christ will deceive with a message that will transcend any and every religious belief in the world. And his crowning achievement will be to proclaim himself God and demand to be worshipped. Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God. (II Thessalonians 2:3-4) What better way to unify all religions of mankind, including the religion of naturalism that holds sway among the scientific community, than to have a person come on the scene as a representative of a federation of planets, provide proof through signs and wonders, and then claim to be our creator? Speculation? Absolutely. Please take this with a large grain of salt and a healthy dose of Acts 17:11. But remember this. Following the Rapture, our panic stricken world will be looking for answers. Some will turn to the Bible and find the true and living God. Some will continue to reject God's Word, and Satan will provide an alternative. Those who know their Bibles won't be taken in. Those who preferred Star Trek to Scripture may find a custom fitted lie they have been completely pre-conditioned to receive. It all comes down to whether we decide to embrace "the love of the truth".
Scott's Blog 3/28/07 UFO's - What On Earth is Happening? There is no doubt that the subject of UFOs and Extra terrestrial visitors is one of intense interest in our culture. A
recent CNN/Time Magazine poll revealed just how open to the idea
of visitors from other planets we have become.
While nearly three-quarters of the 1,024 adults questioned for the poll said they had never seen or known anyone who saw a UFO, 54 percent believe intelligent life exists outside Earth. Sixty-four percent of the respondents said that aliens have contacted humans, half said they've abducted humans, and 37 percent said they have contacted the U.S. government. So what is a biblical response to this issue? A key principle that can bring solid perspective is found in I John 4:1. Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world. Testing spirits? What in the world do spirits have to do with UFOs and extra terrestrials? More than most of us would like to think. UFOs consistently behave in ways at odds with the laws of physics. They will appear on radar and be invisible to the eye. They have reportedly pulled off maneuvers like a 90 degree turn at speeds of 4,000 miles per hour. These kinds of reports have lead even secular researchers to rethink the idea that UFOs are best explained in physical terms. Consider the conclusions reached by French researcher Dr. Jaques Vallee. In his recent autobiographical book, Forbidden Science, Vallee summed up his views about the provenance of UFOs, a viewpoint that he's developed through decades of research: "The UFO Phenomenon exists. It has been with us throughout history. It is physical in nature and it remains unexplained in terms of contemporary science. It represents a level of consciousness that we have not yet recognized, and which is able to manipulate dimensions beyond time and space as we understand them." So much for anti-gravity-powered starships ferrying Big Brothers from outer space. Vallee thinks UFOs are likely "windows" to other dimensions manipulated by intelligent, often mischievous, always enigmatic beings we have yet to understand. (60 Greatest Conspiracies of All Time covers Vallee's theories in detail.)Heretic Among Heretics Jacques Vallee Interview - UFO Evidence "Windows to other dimensions manipulated by intelligent, often mischievous, always enigmatic beings we have yet to understand"? Although Vallee would undoubtedly disagree with this paraphrase, UFOs seem to be a manifestation driven by intelligent spiritual beings. The Bible tells us there are intelligent beings in this universe that are not human - they are called angels. And of the angels He says: Angels come in two basic categories according to the Bible - elect (those who serve God) and evil (those who fell in Satan's rebellion). It is my belief that those who observe the essentially spiritual phenomenon of a UFO, or even come in contact with a being from a UFO are in contact with angels. The big question is, are these angels elect or evil? The answer is to be found in the message they bring and its impact on those who receive it. It is fascinating how quickly people make the jump from seeing some unexplained phenomenon in the sky to the conclusion they are dealing with an emissary from an extra terrestrial civilization. UFOs flew over Phoenix in '97, Symington says
ARIZONA DAILY STAR
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 03.23.2007
Former Gov. Fife Symington says now that those strange lights that appeared over Phoenix a decade ago were from another world and that he had a close encounter with an alien craft on March 13, 1997.
"I'm a pilot and I know just about every machine that
flies. It was bigger than anything that I've ever seen. It
remains a great mystery. Other people saw it, responsible
people," Symington said Thursday. "I don't know why
people would ridicule it."
Symington, who was in his second term as governor of
Arizona during the Phoenix Lights incident, recently told a
UFO investigator making a documentary that he had kept quiet
about his personal close encounter because he didn't want to
panic the populace.
He repeated his story Thursday on CNN, saying the craft he
saw was "enormous. It just felt other-worldly. In your
gut, you could just tell it was other-worldly." Symington
said he's always believed that life existed elsewhere.
"The universe is a big place and we're conceited to think
we're alone."
UFOs flew over Phoenix in '97, Symington says www.azstarnet.com ® The funny thing is, that along with this gut feeling, comes an almost concurrent belief in life arising by accidental evolution. This is a spiritual message. It is not in harmony with the truth of God's Word. The deception gets more pronounced when we begin to examine the so called "Close Encounters of the Third Kind". Those who claim to have had actual contact with extra terrestrials consistently report either being terrorized by these creatures, or being given a distinct message to share. Inevitably they claim that they are our creators, or that Jesus was simply one of them. There is a great stress laid on eastern mysticism and reincarnation. Matt Slick of the Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry offers this interesting take on the spiritual side of "contactee" phenomena. Research of UFO
abductees has led to some interesting discoveries. According to
those abducted, the aliens are teaching theology. The curious
thing is that the theology is New Age theology; namely, that we
are all divine, all evolving to higher levels of consciousness,
that reality is what you perceive it to be, etc. These are
anti-Christian teachings. In some cases, comments about Jesus
himself have been made that directly contradict biblical
revelation. I've studied the New Age for quite some time, and a
great many people in the New Age not only accept Aliens and
UFO's, but teach that they are more highly evolved than we are
and that we need to learn from them. Is there life on other planets I have no doubt that people who have UFO oriented experiences may have actually seen or experienced something. The big question is, what have they encountered? If it is in fact spiritual, promotes a doctrine that distorts or opposes the clear teaching of Scripture, and leaves the people involved emotionally and spiritually devastated, I can only conclude that the source is demonic. It is the same old lie dressed up for the Star Wars/Star Trek generation.
Scott's Blog 3/27/07 A Waste of Space? Appearances can be deceiving. Especially if what appears defies the normal, physical reality we are so accustomed to and beckons us into the spiritual realm. No words could be more useful in evaluating what has come to be known as the UFO phenomenon. If you caught yesterday's entry on Scott's Blog, you know that we evaluated the idea that we are being visited by emissaries from alien civilizations from a Scriptural point of view. There is a compelling case to be made that the Earth is unique in God's creation as the only place where the miracle of intelligent life can be found. Some might respond by calling that an arrogant or closed minded point of view. In the book and movie "Contact" by Carl Sagan, the lead character Ellie Arroway was famously quoted, "I'll tell you one thing about the universe, though. The universe is a pretty big place. It's bigger than anything anyone has ever dreamed of before. So if it's just us... seems like an awful waste of space. Right?" Contact (1997) - Memorable quotes Contact (1997) - Photo gallery Maybe not. Could it be the purpose of the cosmos isn't to be some accidental, self driven hatchery of life, but to have a higher calling. Is it possible that the universe as we see it exists to teach the purposeful pinnacle of God's creation, humanity, a thing or two about our Creator? The Bible tells us this is the case. The heavens can tell us that God is glorious. The heavens declare the glory of God; When David looked up at the stars on a dark night in Israel, he saw enough to realize the creation was a reflection of the glory of the Creator. But David didn't know the half of it. The Heart of the Whirlpool Galaxy
HubbleSite - Image The Heart of the Whirlpool Galaxy
HubbleSite - Image Hubble's Sharpest View of the Orion Nebula
HubbleSite - Image Detail of Saturn's Rings, Disk and Shadow When we see the universe in all its grandeur it is easy to feel small and insignificant. How could a God that great and awesome care about tiny people on a tiny planet in a tiny galaxy compared to the vastness of space? The heavens are also there to remind us of God's great compassion and care for us. When I consider Your heavens, the work of Your fingers, And the son of man that You visit him? I have talked with people who have no problem conceiving that God is great enough to create the wonders of the universe. They seem to have doubts that God could have time to care for insignificant creatures like us. But if God is powerful enough to do the big things like hold the universe together, what makes us think He couldn't do something as small as love little people like us? The heavens are also there to answer the biggest question of all - are we alone in the universe? For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse. (Romans 1:20) The Bible tells us that a look at the creation tells us that we are not alone - God is with us. So if the universe exists to teach us a few vital lessons about its Creator - That He is glorious. That He is awesome. That He is involved in the lives of His people. That is anything but a "waste of space". So what are we to make of supposed contacts with beings who claim to be from other worlds? Are we a visited planet? Check this space tomorrow for a perspective you will never encounter in a Steven Spielberg flick! Scott's Blog 3/26/07 The Truth Is Out There? Do you remember the first time you read the Bible? I must admit my first look at the Scriptures came after I read a book by Erich von Daniken. Chariots of the Gods - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Von Daniken claimed that the Bible contained accounts of encounters with UFOs. So, my non Christian curiosity sufficiently aroused, I pulled out a Gideon Bible and started to read the book of Ezekiel. (Nice place for a complete rookie to begin in depth Bible study, don't you think?) There is no doubt that the subject of UFOs is an instant attention getter. Consider the technological crisis the French national Space Agency faced last weekend when it decided to make it's official UFO files public.
BBC NEWS World Europe French UFO fever crashes website Perhaps it's a result of years of exposure to sci-fi epics that have confidently asserted "We Are Not Alone!" Maybe it is our natural sense of distrust toward government agencies that lead us to believe there is a high level cover up and that "The Truth Is Out There". But raise the subject of new info on UFOs and get ready to watch your server crash. So what is the truth about UFOs? Are they piloted by extra terrestrial creatures from advanced civilizations? (And if so are they getting ready to help us, or feature us as a new entree for intergalactic Business Class customers?) Does the Bible provide any insight into this mystery? The answer is "Yes". But not in the way Erich von Daniken imagined. To be sure, we can't turn to a page of Scripture and find a verse that directly confirms or denies the possibility of intelligent life on other planets. But the Bible does give us an overview of cosmic reality that can shed significant light on the issue. An Insight From Creation It doesn't take an advanced biblical scholar to come to the conclusion that the account of the Creation is undeniably Earth centered. In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. (Genesis 1:1-2) So Earth centered is this account that the other parts of the universe don't come on the scene until Day Four of the creation week. Then God said, “Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years; and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth”; and it was so. Then God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. He made the stars also. God set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth, and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good. So the evening and the morning were the fourth day. (Genesis 1:14-19) Some may object, saying, "Well, since the readers of Genesis were to be people here on Earth, no wonder where we live gets first priority. But it doesn't mean there can't be life elsewhere." True, but the notion of a Star Trek style universe gets more difficult to support Biblically when we see the summary statement God gives to His creation work. Thus the heavens and the earth, and all the host of them, were finished. And on the seventh day God ended His work which He had done, and He rested on the seventh day from all His work which He had done. Then God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it, because in it He rested from all His work which God had created and made. (Genesis 2:1-3) The account of the Creation strongly suggests that intelligent life (if not all life) is limited to Earth. To try to counter this by saying, "Well, it doesn't say there couldn't be intelligent life on other planets as well." is an argument from silence. There is nothing in the historical account of God's creative work that even hints in the other direction. The Bible also tells us that the events that took place in the Garden of Eden (the fall of man) had an impact on the entire Creation, not just Earth. For the earnest expectation of the creation eagerly waits for the revealing of the sons of God. For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it in hope; because the creation itself also will be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now. (Romans 8:19-22) If there were "little green men" on another planet, in another corner of the galaxy, why would what Adam and Eve chose to do here, effect the life experience of a different species over there? And yet the whole creation has been effected by man's fall. Genesis strongly indicates that this Earth is the uniquely created place of intelligent life in the universe. An Insight From Revelation The other Scriptural insight that leads me to conclude that extra terrestrials are mythical is the central role events on Earth play in the Last Days. When God entered into this physical reality He came to Earth, as a man. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. (John 1:1-3,14) Some Christian thinkers (i.e.- CS Lewis) have speculated that if Jesus came to Earth and became a man to redeem us, He would also go to other planets, become one of their local life forms and redeem them as well. But again this is an argument from silence. The plot thickens further when we see what will happen when Jesus returns again to this Earth. Then I saw a great white throne and Him who sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away. And there was found no place for them. (Revelation 20:11) Peter makes the universal impact of God's dealings on Earth shockingly vivid. But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up. Therefore, since all these things will be dissolved, what manner of persons ought you to be in holy conduct and godliness, looking for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be dissolved, being on fire, and the elements will melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to His promise, look for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells. (II Peter 3:10-13) To paraphrase the popular tourist slogan, "What happens on Earth, doesn't stay on Earth." When God finishes His dealings here, the entire universe is effected. Just as in the beginning Earth, and only Earth is God's focus, so in the end events on Earth, and only Earth determine the destiny of the entire creation. God doesn't seem to provide room for the possibility of extra terrestrial civilizations in His Word. So if UFO's are not emissaries from other civilizations on other planets, what are they? Are there intelligences at work in our universe we have never seen represented on Star Trek? Check back tomorrow as we discover an eye opening answer.
Scott's Blog 3/23/07 Provocation and Prophecy One of the most important pieces of prophetic perspective believers in Christ need to keep handy is Jesus' prediction concerning the time of His return in Matthew 24:4-8. And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not troubled; for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. And there will be famines, pestilences, and earthquakes in various places. All these are the beginning of sorrows. Jesus said we could anticipate a pattern of stress that would become more and more prominent as the End Times draws near. The word translated "sorrows" carries the idea of the birth pains of a woman in labor. Crisis moments will build both in frequency and intensity. The last 24 hours presented the latest labor pain. As reported by the Times of London:
Hostage fears over troops seized by IranBritain’s crisis with Iran deepened last night after Tehran justified seizing 15 British servicemen by claiming that they had strayed into Iranian territorial waters “illegally”. The incident occurred mid-morning when a boarding party left HMS Cornwall, the flagship of the multinational task force in the northern Gulf, in two small craft to inspect an Iranian merchant ship. When the inspection was completed the British were surrounded by six larger vessels from a Revolutionary Guards naval unit. The Iranian ships are normally armed with heavy mounted machineguns while the British had only side arms to protect themselves. The British personnel were then escorted at gunpoint into Iranian territorial waters, where they have now disappeared. Commodore Nick Lambert, the commander of HMS Cornwall, said that a helicopter monitored the boats being moved up the Shatt al-Arab waterway, which demarcates the Iran-Iraq border, towards an Iranian base. There were hopes that the situation could be resolved as it was in 2004 when eight Royal Marines and sailors were abducted in similar circumstances by the Iranians. The men were paraded on television and made to “apologise” but were eventually freed. Hostage fears over troops seized by Iran-News-World-Middle East-TimesOnline It appears no such easy solution is in the offing. Iran seems bent on ratcheting up its confrontation with the West. Relations with Britain have since become much more strained. British commanders in southern Iraq have openly accused Iran of arming, training and funding Shia militias responsible for attacks on British forces. The Iranians are also angered by a build-up of US forces in the region and the arrest and detention of five of their officials in northern Iraq by the US military in January. There are also fresh tensions over Iran’s nuclear programme. Britain is the co-author of a United Nations Security Council Resolution, due to be voted on today, that would impose sanctions on Tehran. President Ahmadinejad, the Iranian leader who was due in New York today to debate the motion, abruptly cancelled his visit last night, citing delays in obtaining US visas for his entourage. Hostage fears over troops seized by Iran-News-World-Middle East-TimesOnline There are two other factors that are certainly coming into play. The first is strictly political. It is significant to note that this brash action took place almost concurrently with the vote in the United States House of Representatives to pass a desperately needed military appropriations bill that includes a date certain clause for withdrawal of American forces from Iraq. Although the bill has been promised a swift veto by President Bush, it sends an encouraging signal that possibly as early as March 2008, Iran will be given clear passage to accomplish its long desired goal of dominating Iraq. The message won't be missed by other Gulf states that the Ahmadinejhad regime is going to be the big boy on the block. If they are willing to have their Al Quds forces directly involved in fighting the Americans, and their navy humiliating the British, who will nations like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar be able to look to for help? The other factor is spiritual. As we have documented in this space, Ahmadinejhad and the Mullahs who run Iran believe fervently in the hope of a coming Moslem messiah, the Imam Mahdi. He will come during a time of world wide conflict (with Jesus as his supportive side kick) to bring in an era of peace. There is a good possibility that the Iranians' recklessness isn't craziness, but a calculated attempt to force this prophecy to come to pass. This may be why even Iran's most staunch ally in the UN Security Council, Russia, has sent signals that even they have had enough. Vladimir Putin has gone so far as to halt shipments of enriched uranium, and to recall over 2,000 Russian experts that were working on the Iranian nuclear facility at Bushehr. As Bible prophecy expert Joel Rosenberg comments: It is certainly an interesting development, and one that's had me curious for the last week or so....but honestly, I'm not so sure it's as dramatic as some -- including Drudge and the Times -- seem to believe....all indications thus far have demonstrated that Putin believes Russia's strategic interests lie in developing a military and economic alliance with Iran....but Putin also wants it to be clear to Ahmadinejad -- and to the West -- who is really in charge of this relationship....thus, while this could eventually prove to be a strategic change of direction for Russia, it is more likely a power play by the Kremlin to remind Iran, the junior partner in this emerging alliance, just who's the boss....we'll likely have a somewhat better sense of the relationship between Putin and Ahmadinejad in the next few days....JOEL C. ROSENBERG Ezekiel 38:1-8 indicates that Russia, not Persia, will lead the Last Days confederation of nations that will invade Israel. Israel is also predicted to be in a guard down position when this strike occurs. Because of these two factors, it is likely that Iran will bluster, successfully give the West another black eye in the realm of world opinion (remember 1979 at the US Embassy, anyone?), but ultimately back down. The Ahmadinejhad regime needs time to complete it's nuclear WMD program, as well as to continue its war against the will of the West to oppose their plans. This birth pain is certainly an attention-getter, but it too will pass. It is also significant that the 15 British sailors were taken by Iranian gun boats while a vastly more powerful frigate watched and did nothing. Ahmadinejhad may have gambled on this operation as an object lesson for his neighbors. So what if the US sends two carrier groups to the Gulf? All the weaponry in the world is window dressing unless you have the will to use it. Some have wondered why the United States isn't mentioned in prophecy. Perhaps we are seeing the beginning of an answer.
Scott's Blog 3/22/07 A Believer Among The Idols? There are many questions that are running through the minds of American Idol Fans this season. Has the program become more mean spirited? Do Ryan Seacrest and Simon Cowell really despise each other, or is it all just an act? How does that guy who acts like Michael Jackson (without the talent) keep coming back? But to these burning questions, I would like to add another (and no, it's not "Who cares?") - Is American Idol any place for a believer in Jesus? Believe it or not, one contestant who has made the final 10 is facing that very same issue.
The controversy here reminds me of a conversation I had with a very talented Christian friend who is in the music business. She told me that one of the most important questions believing artists face is how to define Christian music. "Is it music about our faith, or is it music done by people who share our faith?" Chris Sligh seems to have forced the issue. There is no doubt that he has taken some risks to be true to his convictions. Choosing to sing DC Talk's"Wanna be Loved" was considered a potentially contest ending move, but he remains in the top 10. There is little chance we will be singing "Endless Love" in church this Sunday, either. Chris Sligh evidently believes that a Christian singer is a believer in Christ who sings both spiritual and secular songs. So can a Christian be a part of something like American Idol? When facing this issue there appears to be two equal and opposite errors we can make. One is to assume that the number one priority of the Christian life is to avoid as much contact with non believers as possible. This "duck and cover" school of Christianity will guarantee you may never hear a discouraging word about your faith, but it will also effectively insulate you from any chance to be salt and light in this world. “You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt loses
its flavor, how shall it be seasoned? It is then good for
nothing but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot by men. From Daniel serving in the governments of Babylon and Persia, to Paul's greetings from the believers who served in Caesar's palace (Philippians 4:22), there is no doubt that believers have found themselves in some thoroughly secular places down through time. With common sense limitations, it seems that the real issue isn't so much where Christians find themselves, but who they are in the circumstances. But in this commendable call to impact the world for Christ there is also a danger. Keep your behavior excellent among the Gentiles, so that in the thing in which they slander you as evildoers, they may because of your good deeds, as they observe them, glorify God in the day of visitation. (I Peter 2:12) Notice that Peter says we have to keep our spiritual guard up when we find ourselves in secular situations. I can think of no avenue more fraught with peril than that chosen by Chris Sligh. It doesn't take much digging to find case study after case study of people who wanted to be shining lights for Christ who didn't change the world but instead were changed by it. The bottom line is God can use us virtually anywhere as long as it doesn't require shelving Scriptural standards to be there. God has opened the door for Chris Sligh to be in an incredibly prominent, and now controversial position. His conduct and character will be scrutinized on a level few of us will ever experience. Let's pray that this moonlighting worship leader will stand strong in the love and truth of Christ in these extraordinary circumstances.
Scott's Blog 3/21/07 Thanks For the Memories? It sounds like a premise for an episode of the Twilight Zone. Presented for your approval - a scientific breakthrough. A simple blue pill that will erase every trace of the most painful and traumatic memories of our lives. All our regrets and fears wiped clean from our consciousness. Rod Serling might ask us, "If you could take this pill, would you take this pill?" Rod Serling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Believe it or not, this choice may not be one waiting on the other side of the door we "open with the key of imagination". It may be waiting for us in a doctor's office soon.
There is no doubt we all have experiences that we would just as soon forget. And this doesn't just apply to traumatic events where we happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. We also carry the baggage of our own bad decisions and their oftentimes unanticipated consequences. It has been said that the person who looks at their life and says, "No regrets!" is either a sociopath, suffers from amnesia, or is just not paying attention. But even in Christian circles the idea of dealing with painful memories is a tricky one. There are those who encourage believers to imagine Jesus entering into their most painful moments to take the trauma away. Others tell us to ignore the past in the name of "forgetting what is behind". So how does God want us to deal with our memories? Do we reinvent our past, or ignore it? The problem with inviting Jesus into our memories in some exercise of guided imagery is one of honesty and reality. When through a sanctified exercise in wishful thinking we change how our past went down, we run the risk of putting words into Jesus' mouth. How do we know the soothing words of the therapist are really what the Lord would say in the circumstance? Secondly, just because we imagine our past in a different way doesn't change the objective reality of what actually occurred. The so called "healing of the memories" movement has run into real trouble with problems like False Memory Syndrome, where a guided trip into the imagination makes people more angry, hurt and even delusional about their past. There are those who react to such excesses by boldly stating that a real Christian has no business looking into their past. They quote the Apostle Paul, Brethren, I do not count myself to have apprehended; but one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind and reaching forward to those things which are ahead, I press toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus. (Philippians 3:13-14) The problem with this view? The things Paul wanted to forget weren't areas of pain, but pride. For we are the circumcision, who worship God in the
Spirit, rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no
confidence in the flesh, though I also might have
confidence in the flesh. If anyone else thinks he may have
confidence in the flesh, I more so: circumcised the eighth day,
of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a
Hebrew of the Hebrews; concerning the law, a Pharisee;
concerning zeal, persecuting the church; concerning the
righteousness which is in the law, blameless. The context here isn't about denying personal pain ever existed. Rather Paul was forgetting all the spiritual resume items he used as a basis of righteousness before God. So if we aren't to reject our past, or reinvent it, what are we to do with it? How about redeem it? A classic example of this is found in one of the most painful memories Paul carried with him from his days before Christ. And I thank Christ Jesus our Lord who has enabled me, because He counted me faithful, putting me into the ministry, although I was formerly a blasphemer, a persecutor, and an insolent man; but I obtained mercy because I did it ignorantly in unbelief. And the grace of our Lord was exceedingly abundant, with faith and love which are in Christ Jesus. This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief. However, for this reason I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might show all longsuffering, as a pattern to those who are going to believe on Him for everlasting life. Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, to God who alone is wise, be honor and glory forever and ever. (I Timothy 1:12-17) If there was ever any man who would have given anything to change or simply ignore his past it was Paul. As a believer there were undoubtedly times when he met other Christians who had suffered by his hand when he was Saul of Tarsus, a man who lived and breathed to destroy the faith. If we were in Paul's sandals we could easily imagine living each day trying to keep such guilt producing flash backs at bay. But instead with a remarkable sense of honesty, Paul brought his past before the Lord and essentially said, "Please use it." There are episodes of life that we carry with us that are almost crushing in their weight on our souls. But when I encounter another believer who is struggling in the same way, and am able to say, "You know what? I've gone through the same thing. Here is what God has taught me. Here is how Jesus has helped me."- there is power in those words. There have been times in my life where I have tasted despair. There are times when I am genuinely afraid I may have to visit similar circumstances again. But when I remember how the Lord has been faithful to me, and how He gave me greater compassion for the hurting while I was there, I thank God I haven't forgot those times. Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and God of all comfort, who comforts us in all our tribulation, that we may be able to comfort those who are in any trouble, with the comfort with which we ourselves are comforted by God. For as the sufferings of Christ abound in us, so our consolation also abounds through Christ. (II Corinthians 1:3-5) If you could take a pill and forget the pain of your life, would you do it? And in the process forget the faithfulness of God? And in the process forget how to empathize with others who hurt? And in the process forget the insights into the Word you can only find in the Valley of Tears? (see Psalm 84) Would you take that pill?
Scott's Blog 3/20/07 Zeal Behind the Wheel Have you ever found yourself thinking, "If only people would drive like me, then we'd really be getting some place!"? Me too. I've got to admit it, more than once I have questioned where the people I share the roads with got their drivers licenses. Especially people who drive under the speed limit in the left lane. Or feel the perfect place for multi tasking (executing the trifecta of shaving, rapping on the cell phone and reading the newspaper) is when they are piloting a three ton metallic projectile at 80 miles per hour. Or the unique Tucson phenomenon of feeling a need to come to a complete stop in the highway before facing the ultimate challenge of making a right turn. Aaaargh!!! After a tough day it's easy to let someone else's driving habits become the straw that breaks the proverbial camel's back. Annoyance turns to frustration. Frustration turns to anger. Anger makes us forget we have that Christian fish on the rear bumper. So we flick the lights. Honk the horn. Pull up along side and give that person (who had the nerve to be driving on public streets when I have somewhere to be five minutes ago) a double barrel of concentrated stink eye. Let's face it, nothing can cause us to lose our sanctification more than a good old fashioned traffic jam. But before you decide to see if some well timed tail gating can motivate that slow poke to travel faster than the speed of mule, consider this story from the Detroit Free Press.
The thing that hits me most in this story of inappropriate anger management was my first reaction. "Yeah. I could see that happening." Couldn't you? And in a society where we have added the term "road rage" to our vocabulary, maybe God is trying to speak to us. And perhaps the message may hit closer to home than we'd like to think. As in, "Does the work of the Holy Spirit in my heart get put on 'pause' when I get behind the wheel?" But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control. (Galatians 5:22-23) Could you imagine how different our morning commute would be if we took a moment and prayed, "Lord, please take the way I drive today as an opportunity to demonstrate Your power to change the way I live."? Maybe I'd be less concerned with getting my way, and getting others out of my way. Maybe I'd take a moment to look at how life circumstances can make something as simple as a right turn a real challenge for people. Maybe I'd realize that person who is slowing me down didn't wake up this morning thinking, "Gee! How can I really bug Scott Richards today?" Maybe I'd leave five minutes early so I wouldn't fall into the trap of thinking my car can be a time machine to get me back on schedule. Maybe I'd be more concerned about showing people I love them by giving them a break, rather than showing them my brake lights. Perhaps tomorrow's trip on the mean streets can be a chance not only to grow spiritually, but also just to grow up. My brethren, count it all joy when you fall into various trials, knowing that the testing of your faith produces patience. But let patience have its perfect work, that you may be perfect and complete, lacking nothing. (James 1:2-4) I wonder if James might have written that while stuck in a Chariot-jam?
Scott's Blog 3/19/07 The Saint Patrick's Day Story You Won't Hear in a Bar Truth, they say, is stranger than fiction. It is also much more powerful and compelling than myth. Consider the story you may have never heard concerning the man known as the patron saint of Ireland - Saint Patrick.
Have you noticed that we have a funny tendency to shroud the most spiritually compelling stories of history in myth and traditions that have little or nothing to do with the greater truths the tell? Truth - For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. (John 3:16) Myth - Ho! Ho! Ho! Truth - "So they rose up that very hour and returned to Jerusalem, and found the eleven and those who were with them gathered together, saying, “The Lord is risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!” (Luke 24:33) Myth - Here comes Peter Cotton Tail! I am convinced that one of the most effective forms of evangelism is telling people the straight story of what God has done in history. When tradition, myth and commercialism is stripped away, and we simply let God's Word speak for itself there is incredible impact. We discover that we don't need to make God's Word "more relevant to our culture", we simply need to make the message plain and accessible in those situations where God allows us to share. Like Patrick, we need to share the one story that makes sense of all the other old stories we hear in our day.
Scott's Blog 3/16/07 Lord of All, or Not at All? Have you ever noticed that certain statements sound good in a sermon, but have a tougher time when exposed to the light of real life? One such slogan, often shared with the best of intentions, goes something like this - "If Jesus isn't Lord of all, he's not Lord at all!" This call to absolute and total commitment to Christ is pretty familiar stuff for most of us. It is a message that has been shared by people with impeccable spiritual credentials.
There is no doubt that commitment is a vital component of every Christian's walk with the Lord. But let's take a moment to ask a crucial question - Is total surrender of life - "every bit of it" - necessary before we can be saved in the first place? Is this level of commitment a prerequisite or a product of a genuine saving relationship with God? Consider the experience of Simon Peter. If we had the chance to ask Peter if Jesus was "Lord of all" in his life the evening of the Last Supper there is no doubt what he would say. Yet Jesus knew that Peter was in danger of writing checks with his mouth that his life couldn't cash. And the Lord said, “Simon, Simon! Indeed, Satan has
asked for you, that he may sift you as wheat. But I have
prayed for you, that your faith should not fail; and when you
have returned to Me, strengthen your brethren.” The rest is, as they say, history. Peter's commitment to Christ crumbled in crisis. But in Jesus' warning, we also find a word of encouragement - "But I have prayed for you, that your faith should not fail." Now denying the Lord three times is hardly indicative of an "every bit of it" level of commitment. But notice the commitment of Jesus to his emotion driven disciple. The Lord was going to continue to pray and work with the heart of Peter until he would become all God intended him to be. It wasn't Peter's commitment to Christ that made the difference. It was Christ's commitment to Peter that eventually would transform his life. Sometimes exasperated pastoral types, tired of seeing people failing to walk their talk, take a good whack at spiritual apathy by trying to raise the bar of admission to the Christian life. But while the call to total commitment sounds dramatic, it fails to take into account that other Biblical truth so often heard at Billy Graham Crusades - Just as I am, without one plea But that Thy blood was shed for me And that Thou biddest me come to Thee O Lamb of God I come. I come. Once we are saved, God begins a work of transforming us into the image and likeness of His Son. If we are honest, it can be a three steps forward, two steps back experience. But what God starts, He always finishes. Being confident of this very thing, that He who has begun a good work in you will complete it until the day of Jesus Christ (Philippians 1:6) We need to be careful that the truth of Scripture isn't eclipsed by a nice sounding slogan. If becoming a Christian requires total surrender of our hearts, we are all in trouble. None of us can honestly say that we have made Jesus Lord over every bit of our lives. But the more we experience His love, the more we will love Him. The more we see how committed He is to us, the greater our level of commitment will grow. We can rejoice that God Who knows the heart, Who knows how to work on even tough cases like Simon Peter (and you and me), invites us to the process of becoming like Jesus. Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you completely; and may your whole spirit, soul, and body be preserved blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. He who calls you is faithful, who also will do it. (I Thessalonians 5:23-24)
Scott's Blog 3/15/07 The Bumble Bee Church If you want to get a Christian leader's attention these days use two simple words. Not "Second Coming". Not "Holy Spirit". Not even "Jesus Christ" The two magical words? "Church Growth". Let's face it, it is always more exciting to be a part of a thriving fellowship than one that is on the wane. And when ministries start seeing more and more attenders showing up disguised as empty seats, it's only natural to start seeking ways to reverse the trend. And believe me, there is no shortage of experts out there ready to help with "time tested techniques".
As I read through this article I wasn't struck so much by what it had to say, as much as what it didn't. The words "prayer", "love" and "God's Word" were conspicuous by their absence. In fact, with a few minor adjustments, the same approaches could be used to develop membership at the local Kiwanis Club. I have always wondered if those who follow the "time tested techniques", and see their churches grow ever wake up in the middle of the night wondering if this was a work of God, or just the hand of man? I will never forget an encounter I had while serving on staff at Calvary Chapel of Costa Mesa, California. Two Japanese sociologists studying American churches wanted to know why this "little country church on the edge of town" had over 40,000 people who called it home. Was it small groups? Was it marketing techniques? Was it the emphasis on media? Was it well oiled machine organization? Nope. I told them this was a "Bumble Bee Church" One of the sociologists translated this to the other. They both stared at me blankly. The English speaker then said, "What do you mean, 'Bumble Bee Church'?" I smiled and replied, "When I took biology, my teacher gave a lecture on the bumble bee. It's body is too big for it's wings. By all accounts, it shouldn't be able to fly. But nobody told the bumble bee. In the same way, I can't tell you why this church has grown so phenomenally. Pastor Chuck teaches the Bible verse by verse. We pray. We are encouraged to love one another. But there is no real explanation for this apart from a work of God. We are a Bumble Bee Church." "Ahhh!", the nodded, " Bumble Bee church!" Don't get me wrong. There is nothing wrong with applying common sense approaches in the work of the Lord. But let's never forget that what we are about is His work. My "five year plan" for our fellowship is that five years from now people will look at us and say "That church is a miracle." A Bumble Bee Church. We wouldn't be the first. And they continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine
and fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in prayers. Then
fear came upon every soul, and many wonders and signs were done
through the apostles. Now all who believed were together, and
had all things in common, and sold their possessions and goods,
and divided them among all, as anyone had need.
Scott's Blog 3/14/07 Where Is The Promise of His Coming? "The rapture is a racket!" Now where would we expect to hear such a harsh and intolerant statement? A) The annual conference of the ACLU? B) The annual conference of the American Atheists? C) The annual conference of a mainstream Christian denomination? If you chose "C", congratulations! You have sadly hit the nail on the head.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||